<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More art!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/</link>
	<description>Go dik-dik, go!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miks</title>
		<link>http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Miks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s something worth being called &quot;web 2.0&quot; application.  Seems like my system (Pentium D 3.2-&gt;3.4) could withstand attack of 10&#039;000 divs. It took about 30-45secs for my Firefox to render the page. And each time I hovered over the image and javascript got fired off it took another 30 secs to re-render the page.

P.S.

You have a small typo in your blog. Near e-mail input: &quot;E-mail required)&quot; is lacking &quot;(&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s something worth being called &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; application.  Seems like my system (Pentium D 3.2-&gt;3.4) could withstand attack of 10&#8242;000 divs. It took about 30-45secs for my Firefox to render the page. And each time I hovered over the image and javascript got fired off it took another 30 secs to re-render the page.</p>
<p>P.S.</p>
<p>You have a small typo in your blog. Near e-mail input: &#8220;E-mail required)&#8221; is lacking &#8220;(&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naneau</title>
		<link>http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Naneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Yes, as of yet I haven&#039;t found anyone who could withstand the blast of 10.000 floated divs :D

We&#039;ll see. I did think of some uses for it though. Initially, the idea came when I was doing: http://naneau.nl/2007/05/12/javascript-htmlcss-charts/ 

There may be something I can visualize with this approach... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as of yet I haven&#8217;t found anyone who could withstand the blast of 10.000 floated divs <img src='http://naneau.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see. I did think of some uses for it though. Initially, the idea came when I was doing: <a href="http://naneau.nl/2007/05/12/javascript-htmlcss-charts/" rel="nofollow">http://naneau.nl/2007/05/12/javascript-htmlcss-charts/</a> </p>
<p>There may be something I can visualize with this approach&#8230; <img src='http://naneau.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lee</title>
		<link>http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naneau.nl/2007/05/25/more-art/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Wow, I&#039;m impressed.  I should try sleep-deprived coding.  I just had to try the 10,000 div option and it brought Firefox to its knees on my system (P4, 1.5 gig), but it came back to the light after a couple minutes.  Now we just have to figure out a useful application for your new technique.  And a catchy name too.  In the world of Web 2.0, you can&#039;t underestimate the power of a catchy name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;m impressed.  I should try sleep-deprived coding.  I just had to try the 10,000 div option and it brought Firefox to its knees on my system (P4, 1.5 gig), but it came back to the light after a couple minutes.  Now we just have to figure out a useful application for your new technique.  And a catchy name too.  In the world of Web 2.0, you can&#8217;t underestimate the power of a catchy name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
